1. HOME
  2. Lesson Planning and Evaluation Process

Visitors: 21

Lesson Planning and Evaluation Process

Exam Evaluation Process

Related Documents:

Guide for Exam Question Preparation and Exam Document Submission Process

Archiving Rules for Exam Documents

 Exam Document Submission Protocol 

Course Evaluation Form

Course Submission Report

 

PROCESS SUMMARY

 

 

 

 

MEDEK & YÖKAK Compliant Curriculum Process Management

Quality assurance-based workflow for adding, updating, and removing courses.

🔷 Core Pillars of the Processes

Pillar Description
Stakeholder Feedback Needs analysis is conducted based on feedback from external stakeholders (employers, industry representatives), alumni, and students.
Legislation & Standards Based on CoHE (YÖK), THEQC (YÖKAK), MEDEK criteria, NQF-HETR (TYÇ) compliance, and the Bologna Process.
Program Outcomes Courses are structured to align directly with Program Outcomes (POs).
Strategic Vision University/Directorate vision, digitalization, and future professions are taken into consideration.

➕ Course Addition Process

1.    Needs Analysis: Industry analysis, alumni feedback, and external stakeholder requests are collected.

2.    Academic Proposal: Department faculty members prepare the new draft course (course information package).

3.    Program Alignment Check: The course’s alignment with Program Outcomes (POs) is verified.

4.    Board Approval Process: Approvals are obtained through Department Board $\rightarrow$ Vocational School (MYO) Board $\rightarrow$ University Senate.

5.    Quality & MEDEK Evaluation: Evaluated within the scope of continuous improvement (PDCA cycle).

6.    Implementation: The course is added to the Bologna Information System and the course syllabus is published.

✔ Outcome: New course + contribution to program outcomes + industry alignment.

🔄 Course Update Process

1.    Performance Monitoring: Student success data and course satisfaction surveys are analyzed.

2.    External Stakeholder Feedback: Shifting expectations of the business world are evaluated.

3.    Academic Review: Faculty members revise the course content accordingly.

4.    Technological Update: Emerging technologies and industry tools are integrated into the content.

5.    Board Approval: Approved by the relevant Department and School Boards.

6.    Implementation & Monitoring: The updated course re-enters the PDCA cycle.

✔ Outcome: Updated content + industry-aligned teaching + improved learning outcomes.

➖ Course Removal Process

1.    Strategic Analysis: The course's actual contribution to the program outcomes is measured.

2.    Low Demand: Student enrollment rates and industry needs are analyzed.

3.    Outdated Content: The level to which the course content has lost its currency is evaluated.

4.    Alternative Course Review: New course proposals to substitute the removed course are evaluated.

5.    Board Decision: Removed by the decision of the Department Board and the University Senate.

6.    Transition Plan: An adaptation plan is prepared to ensure students face no victimization or academic delay.

✔ Outcome: Curricular streamlining + elimination of redundant content + quality enhancement.

🔁 Continuous Improvement Cycle (PDCA)

Plan Do Check Act
Stakeholder analysis + determining course needs Implementation of new/updated courses Measuring student success and satisfaction Deciding on revision or removal

A curriculum management model based on continuous improvement under the MEDEK - YÖKAK quality assurance system.